Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Moral absolutism holds that good and evil are fixed concepts established by a deity or deities, nature, morality, common sense, or some other source. Amoralism claims that good and evil are meaningless, that there is no moral ingredient in nature.

  2. 26 de nov. de 2013 · The broad concept picks out any bad state of affairs, wrongful action, or character flaw. The suffering of a toothache is evil in the broad sense as is a harmless lie. Evil in the broad sense has been divided into two categories: natural evil and moral evil.

  3. 16 de ene. de 2019 · The crux of reality and life for sapient beings revolves around the concepts of Good and Evil. For instance one may question whether the universe is mostly good, mostly evil, or neither. Individual actions are considered ethical if ‘good’ and immoral if ‘evil.’.

  4. 16 de sept. de 2002 · The epistemic question posed by evil is whether the world contains undesirable states of affairs that provide the basis for an argument that makes it unreasonable to believe in the existence of God. This discussion is divided into eight sections.

  5. 1 de ene. de 2024 · Definition. To theologians and philosophers good and evil are moral concepts that almost always come together. Good is always defined by evil, the nature of dialectic opposition, and evil is always defined by good. These concepts have been analyzed for centuries.

  6. It is only possible to scientifically determine what is good and what is evil if you allow operationally meaningful definitions of good and evil. This is true of absolutely everything in science. Let's take the example of gravity.

  7. J. S. Mackenzie, The Meaning of Good and Evil, International Journal of Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Apr., 1911), pp. 251-268