Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Hace 5 días · El famoso biólogo ateo, Richard Dawkins, se complace en constatar el mal natural como un poderoso argumento contra la realidad del Dios creador: “La selección natural es un proceso ...

  2. Hace 5 días · Richard Swinburne argues that the existence of God is not a precondition of there being moral truths, but that his existence does impact on what moral truths there are.

  3. 24 de jun. de 2024 · Another argument, developed by the English philosopher Richard Swinburne, is that natural evils can be the means of learning and maturing. Natural evils, in other words, can help cultivate virtues such as courage and generosity by forcing humans to confront danger, hardship, and need.

  4. Hace 1 día · An impressive cast has been assembled, including well-known names such as William Lane Craig, Richard Swinburne, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett (who passed away only recently). These thinkers represent the familiar “Christian theists vs. New Atheists” section of the book, but a number of other perspectives are also present, including ...

  5. Hace 3 días · Richard Swinburne, in his book The Existence of God, put forward an argument for mind-body dualism based upon personal identity. He states that the brain is composed of two hemispheres and a cord linking the two and that, as modern science has shown, either of these can be removed without the person losing any memories or mental capacities.

  6. Hace 3 días · Skeptical theism is criticized by Richard Swinburne on the basis that the appearance of some evils having no possible explanation is sufficient to agree there can be none, (which is also susceptible to the skeptic's response); and it is criticized on the basis that, accepting it leads to skepticism about morality itself.

  7. 11 de jun. de 2024 · In this article, I will look over Swinburne’s Teleological Arguments as presented in his article ‘Argument from Design’. Swinburne’s arguments, and his amazement at facts of nature, displays very well the difference between the theological and rational-scientific worldviews.